this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

20 readers
4 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CybranM@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I hate the software subscription model and the monopolisation happening around adobe and autodesk. I was very sad when they bought allegorithmic

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Nobody likes subscriptions but there's not really another good way to treat software as the living entity it is these days.

Monopolization needs to die in a fire though.

[–] parrot-party@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The old system worked fine. You bought a version and you get to keep it forever. You typically got a year of updates along with it. If your didn't want anything new ever, you were done. If you wanted more updates, you could buy another years worth typically with a nice discount. That way the customer chooses how much they need updates and the company gets paid for the updates.

[–] SpacemanSpiff@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right, and that model actually forced/encouraged development and innovation of the software. If they didn’t make it compelling, no one would buy the new version. Now with the subscription model, these companies don’t need to do anything more than putting a new shade of lipgloss on it every year, they have a captive audience. They can basically pull a Valve and just patch security flaws.

[–] morry040@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's all a symptom of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) becoming the primary revenue metric for many SaaS companies. It's a simple metric that provides a good foundation for forecasting future revenues, so it keeps shareholders happy when a company can explain how much ARR they have and how much they expect it to grow / decline.
Like you said, companies don't need to do anything except protect their ARR with a bit of lipgloss and it also leads to the company shaving off any other parts of their business that are not contributing to that ARR metric.

[–] Pika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

unfortunately with that style of software it also encourages crackers to pirate the subscription in, I know many are doing that with netlimitor because with newer releases it is forcing a paid bi yearly sub in place of the perma license. I'm holding onto my keys and staying on the older version for as long as I can. Sublime Text is the same way

[–] Aetherielle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

ARR is why I arr

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)