this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
161 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

What would they use Word for? This is about submitting data in their own standard formats in tiny files.

The real crime is that they're not switching to online. Using optical discs is going to be even more ridiculous for those tiny files.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

The game is security isn't it? No online means you must have physical access to some systems

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but forcing an entire country to go through physical handling of each and every request is crazy. I really don't understand how they managed for so long.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do we know what the scale was? I would assume it's only for the systems that are required to be air gapped.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

No, unfortunately. 🙂 They're not talking about secure paths inside the office, they're taking about having all their processes using the floppy disks. They have a common format which is proprietary and can only be made with a proprietary PC program and can only be submitted on floppy disks.

load more comments (1 replies)