this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
1382 points (96.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40054 readers
769 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (42 children)

I’m hosting one right now. Lemmyunchained.net

But in will have to Limit Users at some point.

I dont Think people properly understand they can be on any server. And join multiple communities. And it all Show up in their Feed. They don’t Need to worry about “which community has the Most Users”

[–] Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Yes they can be on any instance, but I'm starting to get worried about the number of communities that are on Lemmy.world

[–] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)
[–] MacFearrs@vlemmy.net 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It disregards the benefits of a distributed platform. Imagine if the admins went rouge, or the server data was irreversibly lost, suddenly all that content would be gone or under the authoritarian rule of the admins. Bit dramatic but you get the point.

If the majority of content is on there, we've quite literally taken a decentralised system and centralised it lol

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 6 points 1 year ago

On a more technical level, it takes quite some ressources for a server to broadcast their communities to all other lemmy instances.

"Receiving" a remote community is just reading data and inserting it in your instance. But if a community is hosted on your instance, you have to send that data to each and every instances with at least one user subscribed to it.

So it's really better for everyone to spread out on as many instances as possible. The only thing I would recommend before setting up a community (or your user account) on an instance is to check if you align with their moderation rules/code of conduct.

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We did it ~~reddit~~ err... sorry guys... old habits and all

No. I think the other instances would need to purge that content right? I could be wrong.

Assuming it’s federated. And someone from your server is subscribed to that community.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)