Free and Open Source Software

17814 readers

19 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

132

Ladybird web browser now funded by GitHub co-founder, promises ‘no code’ from rivals (devclass.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Recant@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (28 children)

"What about the good things Hitler did?" Is not the flex you think it is. Also, using the Autobahn does not send support to Nazis

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 11 points 3 months ago (14 children)

Using Lemmy without donating to the developers does not send support to them. Same goes for Ladybird, does it not?

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 13 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Adding to popularity does support them.

[–] Schmerzbold@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

I guess that's true when you're a company trying to sell a product. For an open source project more popularity might just mean more hassle. Sure, it may increase your employment opportunities somewhat, but seeing how entitled and demanding users of os-software can be, I'm sure some devs wish their projects were less popular.

load more comments (12 replies)

load more comments (25 replies)