this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
18 points (80.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

2279 readers
1 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It would be nice to have a pair of glasses I could use to tune out and blur my surroundings or what I watch but I'm not sure exactly if its a thing...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Still absolutely terrible for any length of time.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

I'm curious if that would be different for simulated blurriness, like if you watch a blurry video, would that be a different story? I feel like that would be different because its not impairing the objective signal or functioning of your normal vision

Like if you have blurry vision, and you don't wear vision-correcting glasses, does that set off an inevitable downward spiral of degradation of your vision?

Why is worse than closing your eyes, probably super dumb question but might as well iron out my understanding of this while we're here 🙏

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just a guess, but I think if your eyes try to focus on something and it improves the image clarity (e.g. using glasses that don't fit your eyes), then it'll keep trying and end up causing problems. If attempts at focusing have no effect (e.g. looking at blurry images), then it'll stop trying and your eyes can properly relax.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whats the timeframe tho. For reasons I dont want to throw out there haha I can sort of prove this is nominally inaccurate in my case on the assumption that the time spent in blur is brief.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Looking directly at the sun for short periods of time doesn’t immediately cause problems, but years down the line you will start to notice a section of your vision start to become like a void, no color, no light, just a lack of sight.

Just because you don’t notice an immediate effect doesn’t mean you’re not causing harm. The human body is a wonder of redundancy, and having ways of compensating in the short term. But eventually those compensations start to fade.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)