Matrix

3238 readers

1 users here now

An open network for secure, decentralized communication

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

Anyone tried a Matrix <-> Discord bridge? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by rufus@discuss.tchncs.de to c/matrix@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does it work well? Which one to choose? The official Matrix site shows 3 that seem maintained:

Does anyone have some insight? I don't want to try all of them.

Edit: I don't need anything super fancy like double puppeting. I just want the data from the several Discord communities I joined available through my Matrix server. And it's just me using it. But it should bridge the rooms properly and include the popular media formats, reactions etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JameUwU@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Using Mautrix and appservice, both are good enough for me to talk to my Discord only friends and not have the app anymore

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why both? Isn't one enough?

[–] JameUwU@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I was using appservice to bridge a server that I owned for a college club so others could switch to Matrix painlessly, but seeing ive recently graduated I'll probably get rid of it

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah. maybe hand it over to the next person? I suppose people still need to switch painlessly? But I get it. We used to host lots of stuff in my university years. A forum, chat, classifieds, filesharing... A big photo album for all our pictures and events... As far as I know all of that has gone. Either due to lack of interest or nobody was able and willing to pick it up.

[–] JameUwU@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There was no next person unfortunately, interest in the club died off so Im opting to retire it

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

bummer.

load more comments (1 replies)