this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
77 points (75.2% liked)

Vegan

2954 readers
39 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

  1. We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
  2. No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
  3. Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
  4. Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
  5. All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 8 points 4 months ago (42 children)

Why would it be ok to test on non-human animals but not on humans?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Both occurr.

There are experimental medication trials with volunteer human subjects, often people in a situation where they have nothing to lose and whatever small contribute they may give to advance knowledge on a given field may very well be their last (or only) act of compassion towards others.

Make-up and so called beauty products can and should be tested on humans alone. But medications and other alike present too much of an unknown outcome to test outright on humans. Too many could die before any good data could be gathered to improve whatever is being developed, which would render most research undoable.

Animal testing is, as we stand, a necessary evil we must all carry with us. Let us hope we find a way to end this in a very near future.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The animals didn't consent either and will also die.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz -1 points 4 months ago

Death is an integral part of life.

You can argue, because the concept and notion of consent is exists and is understanble by us, humans, we are burdened with the task of safeguarding those who can not understand it.

Many die, unwillingly, unknown, unnamed, for others to live. It's an unchanging law of nature.

We can and should, are morally obligated to, curtail the cruelty that still holds our reality together. It is wrong but exists and, to a degree, is necessary as reality exists today.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)