this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1008 points (95.3% liked)

Antiwork

8189 readers
417 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (28 children)

Adversaries to a movement will split hairs and redefine a movement anyways.

That's all we are seeing here. Look at now they tried to frame Black Lived Matters, something quite clean cut.

[–] Steve@communick.news 10 points 4 months ago (16 children)

No. We suck at naming things. And communication in general.
"Black Lives Matter Too" would have been more clear.
"Replace the Police" would have been better also.

Even mainstream Democrats suck at it. They should be shouting every day, how they're taking on big corp's, going after antitrust abuses and unpaid taxes; While refusing to audit anyone making less than $250,000. But instead they just keep saying some variation of "The economy's great, stupid."

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"too" implies

a) they don't matter yet

and

b) mattering is a new concept we should consider.

The statement is clear without modifier and requires no qualification, clarification or context: do black lives matter or not?

Or to take the inverse: under what circumstances do black lives not matter? If the answer is "there are none" then obviously black lives matter.

[–] Naboo_calls_for_aid@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

You're not wrong, I guess the biggest issue with it being misconstrued was by people who watch Fox news, but honestly Fox news was gonna find a way to spin it no matter what.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)