Formula 1

8972 readers

99 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location	Date
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan	13-15 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore	20-22 Sep
🇺🇸 United States	18-20 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico	25-27 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil	01-03 Nov
🇺🇸 United States	21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Photographer@lemmy.world

wes@lemmy.world

bwoah@lemmy.world

That Lando jump start (www.planetf1.com)

submitted 6 months ago by davetapley@lemmy.world to c/formula1@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“The stewards reviewed positioning/marshalling system data, video and determined that the video appeared to show that Car 4 moved before the start signal was given,” their report began.

“However, the FIA approved and supplied transponder fitted on the car did not indicate a jump start.

“Article 48.1 a) of the Formula One Sporting Regulations states clearly that the judgment of whether or not there was a jump start is to be made in accordance with the transponder, which did not show a jump start. In the circumstances, we took no further action

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (9 children)

So conflicted. On the one hand good to see them actually sticking to the rules as written, but then: common sense 😵‍💫

[–] Species8472@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

You are forgetting the Carlos Sainz las Vegas incident. Car damaged due to track issues (some cover sucked out), needed to replace several parts, went over limit in spare parts = grid penalty.

Stewards acknowlegd this was not his/Ferrari's fault and thus had common sense, but the rulebook did not foresee any exceptions for this scenario. So they felt obligated to apply the rulebook.

This is a case where they also literally apply the rules.

load more comments (8 replies)