this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
698 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29057 readers
6 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
lwadmin@lemmy.world
lwCET@lemmy.world
jelloeater85@lemmy.world
Serinus@lemmy.world
lw_mod_notification@lemmy.world
698
[Update] Version 0.19 Upgrade - Done! (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by lwadmin@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
210 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

[Update - March 3rd 2024 , 21:14 CET]

The update seems to have worked well. The database migration took some time, but after that it looks everything works as far as we tested. Let us know what you think! And if you like our work, check the donations links in the sidebar ;-)

(As you might notice, the new comments are shown YELLOW, that's not a bug, it's apparently a new feature in Lemmy...)

Hey everyone,

We wanted to announce that we will be attempting to upgrade Lemmy.World to version 0.19.3 on Sunday. The update will start at 2024-03-03 1900 UTC and should hopefully take no more than 2 hours. In the event there are issues, we will roll back to 0.18.5. In the event of a roll back, any data created by users will be lost, so we'll try our best to avoid this!

Hopefully downtime should be minimal <3

During the upgrade, please feel free to make yourself at home on our Matrix and Discord chat rooms.

Lemmy.World Pub

Matrix

Please follow Lemmy.World (@LemmyWorld@mastodon.world) - Mastodon for updates.

As usual, status can be tracked by visiting https://dash.lemmy.world and https://status.lemmy.world

Thanks for your patience in waiting for us. Stability is king for us!

-LW Tech Group

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] freamon@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Hi

Pls check how much traffic you're now sending out for every activity - my server is recording that everything from lemmy.world is being 4 times (e.g. 1 Upvote is sent 4 times to every instance that has a subscriber. Those instances will reject 3 of them for being dupes, but it's still a lot to be sending out).

lemmy.ca had a problem where they were sending everything 3 times, and it was because they were running 3 containers, and they all had the same index number, so maybe it's that.

Thanks.

[โ€“] ruud@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. This made us find out that we misconfigured it. I have now changed the configuration, hope it works.

[โ€“] Bl4ze@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Edit: FYI, I opened the Lemmy Matrix and see that you were already discussing the the dbzer0 admin

Hello Ruud,

Thank you for your work on LW.

Kind of hijacking this thread, but are you aware that 19 instances seem to be constantly lagging behind? https://phiresky.github.io/lemmy-federation-state/site?domain=lemmy.world

Among them

  • lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • lemmy.sdfeu.org
  • reddthat.com
  • lemmy.nz
  • lemdro.id
  • slrpnk.net

I usually use Reddthat, but used this account to make sure that this would go through.

Slight ping to @Rooki@lemmy.world as they commented on the previous comment

[โ€“] Rooki@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hi,

yes we noticed that, and we will look into the issue with the federation. Thanks for the reminder!

[โ€“] Bl4ze@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Thank you for your work!

load more comments (3 replies)