this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
45 points (100.0% liked)

News

7 readers
7 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

The justices are forced to confront the gun policy disaster that it created.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I know no one wants to hear this, but due to the fact that the current SCOTUS leans Right and the US Constitution specified that firearm ownership "Shall not be infringed", the most likely outcome will be that spouse abusers will be allowed to continue to own guns.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

not exactly what it's saying, there.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

the 2a a) recognizes that a well regulated militia(*) is necessary and b) the people need to be allowed to keep arms to allow that to happen.

That's it.
* "The Militia" is probably referring to, what we could consider today to the be national guardsmen (during this time period, the 'militia' was just men of a certain age- military age. it was also common for towns to muster their own militia for the purpose of things like law enforcement.)

That said.... yeah. they're probably going to fuck up on this one too.

[–] Grumps@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Conservatives never read the whole thing. They just repeat the bits they like -- like a bible.

FWIW, it also says, "the people" not "a person." When the constitution is enumerating an individual right, it typically does so with different language.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)