this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
305 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59389 readers
3126 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Not enough, this is toll tax for them.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Is Apple making over €500m in profit in the EU specifically as a result of anticompetitive practices involving music?

I'm all for punishing white collar crime severely, but the goal for the EU seems to be to set the fines so they're not especially punitive, but still high enough that the offender would have saved money by just playing by the rules. That's a damn sight better than what we usually get in the US.

[–] Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago

I am also wondering where that amount comes from. Though I do not think it should be based on profit. A company can also be unprofitable on purpose in a region in order to destroy the competition an gain market share. Then after conquering the market they increase the prices again.

In this case I suppose it also be difficult to quantify the fine. Of course the duration of the anti-competitive behaviour should also be taken into consideration and apples low willingness to better itself. Is there any article explaining the 500m euro?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)