this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
258 points (95.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
643 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello just making a poll, which one do you prefer? personally I prefer x265 but since the rarbg falldown i've seen that almost all 1080p rips are in x264, what do you think about that, and do you recommend any place to find more x265 content beside those in the megathread?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] haych@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd like to have the hard drive space for x264, but as I don't I prioritise 265. If I do download 264 I then use tdarr to convert it to 265 myself.

[–] eelynn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Curious, Im pretty new to with encoding, but wouldnt going from 264->265 (lossy to lossy) cause further quality loss? I know you arent supposed to do that with audio, did it hurt your video quality at all?

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

This is accurate as you're making a copy from a copy. Better to download a remux and then convert that.

[–] haych@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but I prioritise hard drive space over quality. There's occasionally artifacting and whatnot, but I don't have the space to download everything in super high quality.