this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
97 points (94.5% liked)

Ukraine

8279 readers
593 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com -3 points 9 months ago (11 children)

If you attack EU, you die. That shall be rule.

First strike is the sharpest sword and the biggest shield.

Why would you need to understand something when that something already fucks up the whole world?

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The EU doesn't need nukes to defend itself from a Russian invasion. Ukraine got the West's hand-me-downs and has completely stalemated Russia with them for over a year. Russia's conventional forces are a paper tiger. The question is will Russia resort to nukes when the war goes sideways for them.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Russia will continue to soften up the EU, and the US with hybrid psyops warfare then take bits and pieces of real estate. It is working quit well now actually.

[–] letsgocrazy@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Depends how you consider "quite well" - the total collapse of Russia's military credbility, the insanely high casualty rate, the loss of material, for something that they were already allowed to use in Crimea, and a part of the Donbas?

I wouldn't call that "well" at all. Seems like a completely disaster.

load more comments (8 replies)