this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
464 points (96.6% liked)

Funny

6758 readers
215 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (15 children)

I would not hire a photographer without the agreement specifying that I get to keep the raw files (either in addition to or instead of whatever retouching the photographer wanted to do).

[–] netwren@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (14 children)

I have met a few photographers who absolutely will not agree to that and it infuriates me. Must be some new trend of pro photographer influencer bull to hold your raws hostage.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The raws affect the photographer’s reputation, if someone else presents them as “This is some of that photographer’s work”

[–] netwren@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So watermark the raw as unedited or something so you can verify it wasn't your finished product. Don't lock me out of being unable to see the actual moment of me and my family.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

it's not the "actual moment" though. Doesn't matter how unedited it looks like, how "actual" it feels it's still an image captured by a camera in a flawed way

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)