this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
214 points (84.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9770 readers
162 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's insane the lengths that some people will go to save a few seconds on their commute, while also endangering others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (25 children)

"Speed trap" cameras are an entirely apt name. The solution to speeding isn't cameras, or patrols, or administrative controls, it's traffic calming, and that reduces capacity, so it's not considered. The trap is driving on the road at speeds they seem to be designed for, with speed limits significantly lower.

Fuck cars, but fuck cops more. We don't need to live in a panopticon. These cameras are a step in the wrong direction, and while I don't think the person who cut them down is doing the right thing for the right reasons, they are doing the right thing.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (23 children)

Cameras are enforcement without the discrimination and potential for violence that cops bring.

Traffic calming is great but it's also more expensive. Maybe drivers should just try driving below the speed limit.

[–] bear_delune@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Incorrect; they discriminate disproportionately on poor people

Unless the fines are proportional to wealth, I don’t see how you can argue that they’re not disproportionally punishing the poorest who are caught.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree the fines should be proportionate, but a police officer doing the enforcement can stop whoever they don't like the look of whether or not they are actually speeding whereas a camera will only target those who are actually, you know, speeding.

[–] bear_delune@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t say pigs are any better.

My point is if someone has the wealth to not feel the fine, the camera does nothing to influence their behaviour and such target those who can’t afford it.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If not cameras and not police then it's what? Just let people drive as fast as they want?

[–] bear_delune@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Shrug a better solution? Most roads have neither, why are you speaking as if it’s a requirement?

[–] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Speeding drivers get points on their licence regardless of their wealth.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

I've had a speeding ticket where I was offered a "no points" option to pay a higher fine. That was only offered after I showed up in court. This would discriminate against poorer drivers.

[–] bear_delune@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

So they get a few opportunities before feeling any kind of punishment?

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)