this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
152 points (98.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5233 readers
696 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
152
Germany’s emissions hit 70-year low as it reduces reliance on coal (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Despite this fall in coal reliance, the thinktank said, “most of the emissions cuts in 2023 are not sustainable from an industrial or climate policy perspective”.

Müller said: “The crisis-related slump in production weakens the German economy. If emissions are subsequently relocated abroad, then nothing has been achieved for the climate.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (9 children)

So you’re saying it could have been even lower

[–] CJOtheReal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Nope. Nuclear isn't green and therefore has no place in the future.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll have you know that Uranium is green (sometimes).

[–] CJOtheReal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Most nuclear Reactors have a blue Shine

https://youtu.be/JvgF83OHV9c

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)