this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
41 points (90.2% liked)

politics

19138 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Biden is planning to make more surgical trips to minority communities in 2024 to reinforce the paid advertising his campaign is broadcasting directly to Black and Hispanic voters, according to people familiar with the matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aelwero@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How do you "broadcast directly to Black and Hispanic voters" exactly? I'm reasonably certain there's no non-racist answer to that question, and it's rhetorical in nature... I'm just saying... That's not how you support minorities... Pardoning 11 whole ass people doesn't sound all that supportive either.

The fuck does he plan on telling these directly targeted minorities? That he's gonna do something for them? He's an incumbent, he's had four years to do something, are people really gonna give a shit that he woke up from his nap because it's election time?

I hope he carries the vote, but God damn is the bar low right now...

[–] pl_woah@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who you pardon is symbolic for how your law enforcement should behave

For example, trump claiming he would pardon specific people or groups

The opposite is true, by saying what you'll crack down on (or stop)

[–] aelwero@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Law enforcement has removed the individual liberty of thousands over something that is perfectly legal in like half the country right now...

The judiciary branch can, and will, argue that their actions were, at the time, criminal activity. They can't really roll that back without some really fucky precedents happening on the process.

It's one of the very few instances when the executive "checks and balances" are truly warranted, and these types of pardons should be absolutely rampant right now, even without a federal descheduling. It's one of the few times we it's simply the right thing to do vs the political dog whistle its generally used as.

It should not be symbolic... But I will concede that it should be a gubernatorial matter :)

load more comments (1 replies)