this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2022
25 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34928 readers
175 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm uncertain if deepfake porn should be banned; it's already difficult to enforce copyright on the internet, because it'll just get redistributed.

Similarly, it would be impossible to enforce restrictions on deepfake porn; because it can easily be redistributed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hewhomustnotbegamed@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I don't think it's a matter of copyright, it's slander. It's demeaning for women to have their faces shown in porn videos they had nothing to do with.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

It's also sexual abuse, on the same level of taking a nude picture without their knowledge and posting it publicly.

That already two crimes: taking an intimate picture without consent, and sharing an intimate picture without consent. So why aren't people getting punished?

[–] electrodynamica@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You realize people are born naked, right? The whole concept that someone being seen "uncovered" is somehow sexual, or that the act of uncovering is somehow a sexual invitation is itself rape culture.

Just as much as men should be allowed to wear dresses, and women wear pants, people should be able to remain or become naked and not have it mean anything.

Of course self-determination is implicit here. So what of deepfakes then, where a man is say photoshopped into a dress? Does that mean his rights have been violated, because people might believe that he intended to present himself that way to the world? I say no.

People try to picture random people they come across in public naked all the time. So what if they were a great artist and could draw or paint a hyper realistic representation of what they imagine? What if one day we have the technology to pull an image from someone's mind? Is this person now committing a thought crime? Does it only become a crime when it is shared with another person?

TLDR people need to be less repressed, not more. Repression is what gets us to crazy accusations of thought crimes and abuse-by-proxy.

[–] BalabakMan@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 years ago

They can get naked after people stop getting horny.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)