this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
156 points (94.8% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

11870 readers
370 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bots of this type have appeared recently, and people are asking if it's okay to use them. I'm not sure about this either, so I think it would make sense to ask users.

These bots follow some subreddits on Reddit and automatically post it to Lemmy when a post is created there.

I've seen an example site for it: lemmit.online. This instance is dedicated solely to mirroring Reddit posts to the Lemmy instance.

Maybe instead of mirroring to a community on Lemmy NSFW, we can subscribe to lemmit.online via Lemmy NSFW. This way we could have kept Lemmy NSFW free of bots. Currently, even if accepted, I believe it should be done under admin control to prevent duplicates.

Here is the poll: https://strawpoll.com/polls/PbZqRw82byN

I'm open to suggestions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th1ckAndCreamy@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I voted no. My biggest concern is that Reddit's legal team would try to take the instance down and then we would have to start all over on a different instance.

[–] Th1ckAndCreamy@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

An instance dedicated for NSFW replication off Reddit could be a workaround. Then at least if Reddit tries to sue it wouldn't effect this instance's native content.

[–] taladar@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not as if an instance is a legally distinct entity.

[–] Arnaldur@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they really not? Distinct from what?

[–] paddedperson@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it definitely is its own legal instance the people hosting the instances are responsible for the content served.

that being said there isn't any legal risk of reddit sueing with this as they dont own the conte t so it should be fine

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)