this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
317 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32163 readers
1170 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I first read the titile, I thought that the US is going to have to build A LOT to triple global production. Then it occured to me that the author means the US is pledging to make deals and agreements which enable other countries to build their own. Sometimes I think the US thinks too much of itself and that's also very much part of American branding.

Where are my renewable bros at? Tell me this is bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip 27 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Nuclear power isn't bad. I used to be anti-nuclear energy because of the specter of Chernobyl, 3 mile island, and Fukushima. But learning more about it, there haven't been many actual problems with nuclear energy.

Chernobyl happened because of mismanagement and arrogance. 3 mile happened because of a malfunction. Fukushima happened because of mismanagement and failure to keep up safety standards in case of natural events.

These are all things that can be mitigated to one extent or another. it's much cleaner than other forms of energy, outputs way more than solar or wind, and with modern technology can be extremely safe. I think we should be adopting nuclear, at least as a stopgap until renewable tech reaches higher output in efficiency.

Kinda annoyed that these investments are going into foreign countries, when we are one of the major contributors to greenhouse gas. We should be building them here first to mitigate our own ghg contributions, then helping smaller countries build theirs.

I do still have concerns about waste removal and storage tho, but I'm sure we could figure that out if we actually wanted to. But I doubt we do, because "dA cOsTs" or some shit.

[–] GiM@feddit.de 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nuclear is too expensive. It doesn't make sense to build new reactors.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It doesn’t make sense to build one new reactor. Tripling the world’s nuclear power generation makes a lot more sense. At that scale it’ll be cheaper.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Vqhm@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Most things decrease in price as production scales up.

Is called Economies of scale.

There's also a lot hype around process improvements such as Six Sigma. Some of this has come out of factories and into IT and software dev such as kanban boards and agile.

Strangely most think that software development does not have economies of scale.

load more comments (9 replies)