this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
Linux
5 readers
2 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's wrong with a simple path unit?
I am not exactly sure what you mean by that... But the main advantage is that the command does not have to be executed manually everytime you change something. Instead
entr
recognizes when something changes and re-executes the command for you.That's what a systemd.path unit accomplishes, too. It watches a path, and if that file/directory changes, it starts its accompanying systemd.service.
Ah, you are talking about systemd, wasn't aware of that... I imagine that to be much more complicated for many use cases. E.g. running a unit test (as I describe in the article) isn't something I would use systemd for. Setting up a path and a service seems more complicated than using entr, and it is probably also harder to get to the output as well.