this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
330 points (90.2% liked)

Risa

6899 readers
103 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
330
Cope (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/risa@startrek.website
 

Just once I'd like a post where everyone is chill and positive about stuff instead of focusing on negative

Edit: I dunno why I expect people to ever be capable of being positive anymore. Dunno why I bother.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kucifus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Hard disagree, new star trek has had years to "settle in" and has shown almost no signs of improving on the things that make it poor quality - namely low effort pandering writing and a lack of respect for its audience. Alex Kurtzman and the executives are the problem, and they're not going anywhere soon.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All the exact same arguments that were made against TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT.

But way to look at the description of my post and say "Nah, positivity? Fuck that."

Thanks for that.

[–] Kucifus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You can reasonably disagree with a critical response to a TV show without it being a personal attack on your positivity or that of your post. What are you looking for here? An echo chamber makes for a boring discussion board.

I think it's fair enough to expect writers to understand and respect the media they're working with, and I'd argue that the writing in all those previous shows was leagues more intelligent and considered than the stuff on Kurtzman shows. I get very frustrated at how what was a show about professional and considered officers dealing with clever sci fi scenarios is turned into an action slog "fuck yeah science" show. It's not smart or interesting like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)