this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
154 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
482 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Federated services have always had privacy issues but I expected Lemmy would have the fewest, but it's visibly worse for privacy than even Reddit.

  • Deleted comments remain on the server but hidden to non-admins, the username remains visible
  • Deleted account usernames remain visible too
  • Anything remains visible on federated servers!
  • When you delete your account, media does not get deleted on any server
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] binwiederhier@discuss.ntfy.sh 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The privacy stinks you say? Did you know that Likes and Dislikes are public too? That was the most shocking to me. Because it is very much not like Reddit or others.

It's still a fantastic piece of software, with all its flaws, though.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's impossible to federate these without making them public in this way.

The up-votes are also mapped to favourites in Mastodon etc, so that was always public anyway.

You could argue that this should not be hidden in the Lemmy UI, but there are also good reasons to not highlight that much who voted on a post.

[–] trent@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought votes didn't federate yet anyways... but, yes, it is possible, and i can come up off the top of my head with three or four potential implementations.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good luck with finding an anonymous system that can not be easily abused.

[–] trent@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

FHE solves that through and through, as has been documented widely, but that's overengineering when you could just use plain ZKP.
Zero-knowledge voting is here and has been for a while now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)