this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
108 points (95.8% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4221 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The president’s comment that he has “no confidence” in the civilian death toll in Gaza provided by Palestinians incensed community leaders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

There really are no winners here.

Let's be realistic. Hamas fucked around and found out. You don't go around provoking a regional superpower with decades-old guns and improvised weapons. There was never a situation where Israel wasn't going to go in and curb stomp them in response. Israel has always been open about this.

But the response they gave is beyond inhumane. They've decided that the best course of action is to just "kill 'em all and let God sort it out". The vast majority of their targets so far have been civilian targets, and they defend their actions by essentially saying that since they can't tell the difference between Hamas and the civilians, they're just going to mow down everybody. Hospitals have been bombed. Supplies have been all but cut off. Civilian vehicles targeted on video, with the IDF's official response being barely more than "sucks to be them." Thousands of civilians dead, and Israel's response is to say "we're just getting started" and advancing a ground attack.

There is no justification for that response. None. If Israel had any chance of getting regional or global support for their actions, they pissed that away the second they thought bombing a hospital was a good idea. If they think that indiscriminately bombing civilian targets is going to magically stop their enemies from interfering, they thought wrong (as evidenced by the fighting along the Lebanese border). If anything, Israel just gave them the justification that they have been looking for and probably just made their own situation exponentially worse.

At this point, I really do believe that Biden needs to withdraw all but humanitarian support from Israel. Helping to arm Israel while they commit genocide in real time isn't going to help our position with allies in the middle east. And neither side are exactly saints here. The US should take this into consideration, withdraw military support for Israel, offer humanitarian aid to civilians in both Israel and Gaza, and say they no longer take any position on the conflict outside of protecting US interests.

I would think it would take a hell of a lot to make a terrorist organization like Hamas look like the sympathetic victim. And while I'm not saying they are, Israel seems to be speedrunning their attempts to make them look like they are.

[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Israel doesn't need or want global support, because they know they've got the unwavering support of the only country that matters, the United States. Shit, our own government covered up when Israel attacked us on purpose and killed a bunch of sailors. If they're willing to not only forgive, but go to great lengths to conceal acts of war by Israel against the United States, then there isn't anything they could do to Arab countries they've invaded that would push the US away.

[–] alcyoneous@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

Wow, I had no clue about the USS Liberty incident but that seems pretty damming.

load more comments (3 replies)