this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
829 points (96.9% liked)

> Greentext

7547 readers
677 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's just about the opposite of the relative experience of the actors involved in both trilogies.

The original trilogy was filled with almost completely inexperienced actors. The prequels were mostly cast with experienced performers, excepting the child actors of course.

The real difference is that Lucas didn't actually direct most of the original trilogy in the first place.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've always heard the opposite but I could be wrong.

[–] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, George Lucas hired Harrison Ford as a carpenter because he wasn't interested in doing a second movie after American Graffiti.

Mark Hamill was probably the most experienced member of the original cast because he had done some TV work.

Natalie Portman had starred in four features before Star Wars and McGregor had done more than ten.

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Peter Cushing was hardly inexperienced

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)