It's at least debatable that some of these guys couldn't help it. Like yeah, you shouldn't slaughter innocent people with various instruments of violence, but you also have to consider what their home lives must've been like. Does Freddie Kruger choose to haunt people's dreams? I literally don't know, I'm seriously asking.

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The only one that might have a legitimate argument is Freddy. He was burned to death by a vigilante mob after being "cleared" by the justice system. So one could understand his need for revenge. (Just ignore the fact that he really was a child killer and only got off on a technicality)

[–] AliceTheMinotaur@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Jason has some legitimacy, he was killing camp councilors, as a) they let him die, and b) one killed his mom, who also killed camp councillors who let Jason die

load more comments (4 replies)