this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2022
17 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
31118 readers
305 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
used vim for like twenty years and then switched to nano
(Note for those who downvoted me: Get a life, you weirdos. I'll use whatever editor I want.)
Not downvoting but I'm puzzled. Why switching to nano? After 20 years of vim you probably are an advanced user. After getting some of the goodies of vim, I cannot understand how nano can be appealing. Care to elaborate?
Depends on the use case. I used to think nano was stupid too until I tried to use it for real, and I realized that it is among the best designed editors I've ever used. Yes, it is more simple and don't offer all the functionality of vim. It might be able to do a couple things vim can't, but I would have to double check on that. (Like emacs, nano can re-wrap hard-wrapped text to a specific width, which I'm not sure is easy to do in vim.)
For certain edits or tasks, vim might end up being more trouble than it's worth.