this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
558 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29026 readers
8 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Also because because beehaw has sownvotes disabled. Imo downvotes are an integral part of the Lemmy experience. As it is for reddit.

[–] Bear83170@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The issue lies with what downvotes really mean. We've all seen instances on Reddit where where downvoted to hell because it was an idea contrary to the majority of the sub/echo chamber even though they were totally valid.

[–] maplealmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would very much like a world where upvotes and downvotes are not symmetric. As is we say total is upvotes minus downvotes, but in reality upvotes exist to say "good job" and downvotes should exist to say "this is spam or unnecessary"

A better system, IMO, would be to make downvoting closer to reporting, a little harder to do, but if the ratio of down to up passes a certain threshold, the comment is then flagged for review and/or just massively downgraded.

Oh, and you cannot do that to something you reply to. Either say "this is trash not worth engaging with" and move on, thus ensuring trolls do not get fed, or reply but acknowledge it was worth engagement.

[–] s900mhz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I like where you are going with that thought. I would like to see tags users can vote on like β€œspam, bot, hate, troll” or something. So the users can moderate themselves a bit. These tags can then be reviewed by a moderator who can make the ultimately decide what happens. Of course this is still prone to bridging and bullying but just trying to think outside the box

[–] Shinhoshi@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

I think that’s the kind of idea being debated at https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/ right now

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Honestly it was kinda foolish for Reddit to ever think it was going to be otherwise. People are inherently tribal by nature.

[–] Pili@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

It was absolutely impossible to have a constructive conversation between two opposing beliefs on reddit partly because of that system, it was really infuriating. On the other hand, beehaw seems to outright block the instances where users don't subscribe to their echo chamber, and I don't think that's good either.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's always distressing to see, but if it keeps happening it's also evidence that community isn't worth the time to visit.

[–] wr4th4@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

basically every thread i was apart of.

load more comments (4 replies)