this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
136 points (88.2% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7705 readers
3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If so, was it polled somewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (19 children)

official government papers

What government? It seems like the website you cited disregarded sources because they were from governments. Do you need Chinese government documents specifically?

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

Yes. Just as I would need us government papers if I were to prove the us government is deliberately committing a genocide. Now what can I do to make you interact with the sources?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (17 children)

No problem buddy, let just quickly break into that one chinese government archive where they got all their nasty stuff, should be easy ;^)

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great, so you admit that all you have are the sources previously provided and the inherent flaws they contain zenz We're operating from a point of agreement, then! We do not have strong evidence for the claims being made.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

my dude, just because you can scour the internet for 20-30 articles that support your psy-op, while out right dismissing anything even tangentially related with main stream press as biased, doesn't mean you have a point. It only means you've successfully created a bubble around you. Get outa here.

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

We don't outright dismiss them you dip. We engage with your sources and show why they're unreliable or non-factual. You're the one handwaving sources away and refusing to engage any further. Talk about a bubble around you.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)