this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
427 points (94.0% liked)

World News

32090 readers
1276 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Egon@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

And not use misgendering language? We all make mistakes at times, it's what happens, and it's fair to ask questions to better understand, but being against it after you've been informed strikes me as silly

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The only way I think it can be construed as misgendering language is if the parts of the idiom or turn of phrase are parsed individually, which is exactly the opposite of what you're supposed to do with an idiom.

If this sentence is misgendering myself, then I'm the Queen of England. I get that this guy is a shithead but pretending that he's also doing something wrong here seems to be playing for some esoteric own.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Go off queen" is 100% a thing, which means that "go off king" isn't just a neutral idiomatic expression, but a gendered idiomatic expression.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not saying it's not a thing, but I have literally never seen it used, and I couldn't find an ngram viewer with a corpus end date after 2019.

It would never occur to me to say "go off queen" , in much the same way it would never occur to me to say "yass slay king" regardless of the gender of the referent, making them both gender neutral in my employ.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)