this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
748 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37604 readers
232 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Aww ... poor little ISPs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

Why does everyone try to prove everyone else wrong? That entire first paragraph is completely unnecessary. You can simply add to a discussion without being "well actually " about some detail you want to nitpick. The other two paragraphs are spot on.

[–] cheer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (18 children)

It's really one of the worst things brought over from reddit

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I like to imagine people doing that in an every day conversation. It's ridiculous. No one would ever talk to them lol

[–] Fingerthief@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems like a friendly enough response was given to your comment and you automatically assumed they were only interested in saying you're wrong.

Having a discussion is not "proving everyone wrong"

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Fingerthief@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotcha, you don't like discussions. Noted.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Especially when they were wrong. They're obviously going to pass along any actual cost they have one way or another.

That's not what's shady or what's being addressed. It's the $60 ***(plus $100 in unlisted fees we literally won't even let our support provide or estimate on signup) to lie about prices that's the problem.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recommend reading either the quoted text, or the article. Preferably both.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I did. "Passing on costs" is entirely irrelevant to everything.

The entire point of all of this is that service providers are using nebulous fee structures to lie about pricing. That's the entire thing. There is nothing else.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)