this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
671 points (91.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

19471 readers
30 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (19 children)

I can't wait for AI to make a PC port of every console game ever so that we can finally stop using emulators.

[–] amki@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (18 children)

This won't happen in our lifetime. Not only because this is more complex than rambling vaguely correlated human speech while hallucinating half the time.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Off the shelf models do this, yes.

Sophisticated local trained models on expensive private hardware are already dunking on publicly available versions. The problem of hallucination is generally resolved in those contexts

[–] amki@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but until I see such a thing I chose not to believe in fairy tales.

Decompiling arbitrary architecture machine code is quite a few levels above everything I've seen so far which is generally pretty basic pattern recognition paired with statistics and training reinforcement.

I'd argue decompiling arbitrary machine code into either another machine code or legible higher level code is in a whol other league than what AO has proven to be capable of.

Especially because with this being 90% accurate is useless.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again you aren't seeing this because these models are being developed for private enterprise purposes.

Regarding deep machine code analysis, sure, that's gonna take work but the whole hallucination thing is an off the shelf, rookie problem these days

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not, though. Hallucinations are inherent to the technology, it's not a matter of training. Good training can greatly reduce the likelihood, but cannot solve it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)