this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
378 points (95.7% liked)

World News

32302 readers
1102 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.li/10BV3

The unmanned craft was due to make a soft landing on the Moon's south pole, but failed after encountering problems as it moved into its pre-landing orbit.

It was Russia's first Moon mission in almost 50 years.

Russia has been racing to the Moon's south pole against India, whose Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft is scheduled to land on there next week.

No country has ever landed on the south pole before, although both the US and China have landed softly on the Moon's surface.

No report on whether or not Russia was attempting to use repurposed anti-ship missiles like the ones they use to attack schools and hospitals here on Earth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RuthlessCriticism@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (70 children)

This but unironically. In general though, there is nothing more galling than liberals complaining about Russia. You made it this way. This is on you. First you destroy the soviet union, then you reconfigure the politics and economy of Russia, and then you have the audacity to complain about the very thing you caused.

[–] Surface_Detail@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (54 children)

Ah yes, well known liberal checks notes George Bush.

Russia cannibalised itself after the Soviet Union fell, didn't need any Western help there.

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Please lookup the Shock Doctrine and educate yourself

[–] Surface_Detail@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm not reading a pop politics book for you. Go read The Gulag Archipelago.

[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have. But unlike a book about Boris Yeltsin's systemic hollowing out of the russian economy and the facilitation of this by the Americans, its hardly relevant.

Although if we are bringing up the gulag archipelago, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn is not on your side on the issues. Especially not issues like the yeltsin government, the west's influence on Russia and Russian sovereignty.

[–] Surface_Detail@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's your takeaway, you haven't.

You really thinks that if I don't think the gulag archipelago is about the yeltsin government then I haven't read it? That's just sad dude. That's just really, really sad.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

lol fuck you I'm not eating vegitables. you go eat a pop tart

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“Excuse me but my book was spawned at the beginning of time with no creator and thus no bias or agenda, and is a crystal of pure truth, and yours is poopy tankie peepee”

[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

I don't care about antisemitic noblemen. His book is fake, and he's lucky he wasn't killed.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

"I'm not reading pop politics, go read literal fiction"

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

The one written literally decades before the events in question?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)