this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
93 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a pivotal moment for the autonomous transportation industry, California chose to expand one of the biggest test cases for the technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Yeah...Great...

How about building public transport and not such stupid things?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Public transport has been around for many decades. The US infrastructure and now lifestyle / culture is not built for it and there's not a great reason to think it's suddenly going to catch on. Self driving cars have real potential in the US to have an environmental impact as well save many thousands of lives each year. I wish you were more excited about this.

[–] bron@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

While it is exciting, I can see both sides of the argument here. The infrastructure here in the US is built around cars so it would be much less effort to automate the existing infrastructure. On the other hand, things could be so much more efficient if we focused on trains and other public transport that excels at transporting a large amount of people. But that would take so much more effort and money to update the infrastructure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)