this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
100 points (98.1% liked)

Space

8672 readers
401 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Important to note that any depiction like this of the milky way is an artist's interpretation, as it's not possible to view our galaxy from the outside (yet).

That said, i can't imagine it looks notably different than this..

[โ€“] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The โ€žyetโ€œ makes it sound like we are only a couple years away. Voyager (1977) is the furthest man made object and is 17 light hours away. The milky way in the picture has a diameter of 87.000 light years. So I guess this point of view is like 100.000 lights years away. Maybe I am pessimistic, but I think human kind will never reach this location to snap a real picture like that (and even send it back to earth for another 100.000 light years traveltime).

Now Iโ€™m sad. You made me sad. Thanks god tomorrow is Friday.

[โ€“] pbkoden@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We would probably only ever get a real image like this if humanity becomes a multi-galactic race. And I agree, the odds of that are close to zero and sad.

[โ€“] Antimutt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If only there was a big mirror.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)