this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
46 points (96.0% liked)

Programming

17344 readers
150 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I recently hired into a data analytics team for a hospital, and we don't have a style guide. Lots of frustration from folks working with legacy code...I thought putting together a style guide would help folks working with code they didn't write, starting with requiring a header for SQL scripts first as low hanging fruit.

Or so I thought.

My counterpart over application development says that we shouldnt be documenting any metadata in-line, and he'd rather implement "docfx" if we want to improve code metadata and documentation. I'm terrified of half-implementing yet another application to further muddy the waters--i'm concerned it will become just one-more place to look while troubleshooting something.

Am I going crazy? I thought code headers were an industry standard, and in-line comments are regarded as practically necessary when working with a larger team...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Yes, serious people write docs. I hate this bullshit about code that should be so good that it's "auto-documenting." It never happens in real life. Code is at best of average quality, but it needs documentation. At my previous job they had "guidelines" to make sure that code didn't needed doc. It was a bad joke and we had the worst code I've ever seen.

I don't have solutions for you though. You need a combo of documentation generation, code formatter (in the CI maybe, or before a commit), and code linters to check for errors.

[–] alokir@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Writing self documenting code reduces the need for comments significantly, but you'll still need to write docs and even code comments when needed.

I had a lead architect at one of my previous workplaces who outright forbid writing comments, otherwise the build would fail. That lead to convoluted and slow solutions in order to make the code readable, or just parts that nobody wanted to touch because nobody understood them.

My point is that you should strive towards self documenting code as much as it makes sense, but don't take it to mean that you should never write comments.

People should be able to tell what your code does without going deep into implementation details but that's not always possible, especially if you're working with lower level languages with fewer abstractions, or projects with complex algorithms or architecture.

[–] wethegreenpeople@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its wild to me that some people hear "your code should be self documenting" and take that to mean "never write comments".

All self documenting should mean is I can look at a method and get a general understanding of what it does, and it shouldn't have any unknown functionality. Specific implementations, design quirks, choices that might only make sense if you know business context should all be comments in your code.

On the other side of all that I worked with someone who insisted methods were documented college style, the "authors" name, date it was written, what it does, why it's here, our star sign. I hate that just as much, so much clutter.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its wild to me that some people hear "your code should be self documenting" and take that to mean "never write comments".

It's the same people that hear "security by obscurity is not security" and take it to mean "publicity is more secure than obscurity". A key being under a door mat is bad but putting it on top of the mat because "obscurity isn't security" is silly.

Edit: A better example is having a hidden door with a look is still more secure than having a non-hidden door with a lock.

load more comments (3 replies)