this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
542 points (99.3% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

8538 readers
3 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla's position on WEI is pretty solid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KindredAffiliate@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Mozilla try not to be based challenge (impossible)

[–] tDSpPd2C9MrT8n@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I fear Mozilla will oppose it right up until they implement it, they know who butters their bread and their CEO has a hunger for loafs.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They have already opposed it, and your speculation based on your dislike of their CEO probably isn't helpful. It's against the open web and Mozilla has no incentive to implement this. It's something only an ad company would be keen on.

[–] tDSpPd2C9MrT8n@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is based on them being wholly funded by Google, I think it is helpful to point that out when we are talking about them biting the hand that feeds them. If Google does in fact force this upon you to use their services then Google search will be part of that and Google search is where Mozilla makes a vast majority of its funding.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right now they make money from google for default search because they pay the most. Previously they went Yahoo and could go bing. They did not implement web manifest v3, so you're insinuation isn't based in fact. Plus, this has nothing to do with search, it is to do with after search when on a website.

[–] tDSpPd2C9MrT8n@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If Google is pushing a feature to secure higher ad revenue they're obviously going to implement it on their own services such as search. As for Bing Microsoft have implemented Manifest v3 in Edge and it's unlikely they will skip out on Web Integrity. Time will tell but it's likely Firefox will be pushed into supporting it.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think MS implemented it. It's chromium, they just took the code base. Some browsers actively removed it, but when you're based on chromium, you start with the code that google gives you.

MS taking a codebase and doing nothing with it logically makes no sense to imply that Firefox will purposely resource and write code contrary to web freedoms.

Whether they implement in web search is speculation, they'd be purposefully downranking companies in search for not implementing something that cost them revenue excluding their customers. It would be google vs companies, and it wouldn't be pretty.

Either way, state your position. Are you suggesting people should roll over and take it, or move to Firefox, because all this side debate is doing nothing useful.

[–] tDSpPd2C9MrT8n@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think MS implemented it.

Their decision is detailed here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/extensions-chromium/developer-guide/manifest-v3

Whether they implement in web search is speculation

Sorry if it wasn't clear from my original comment but yes this is speculation for the future.

Are you suggesting people should roll over and take it

I'm suggesting people aren't going to be given the choice if this is actually pushed through to the full extent that Google is hoping. Fighting against it is obviously the right move but it doesn't hurt to imagine a future where that fighting has no meaningful effect.

because all this side debate is doing nothing useful.

Not all discussions are a debate, and these discussions need to be had.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)