The UFO reddit

131 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion related to Unidentified Flying Objects. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. We aim to elevate...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1951
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/everlastingmuse on 2024-11-15 15:28:35+00:00.


in my opinion, something is definitely afoot.

the hearing itself was a more serious vibe, the immediate pushback against it on social media, and the media responses (although slow) have been taking it seriously. now there will be another hearing in the senate. you have AARO hinting at stuff being inexplicable. there is a LOT of information and interviews and hints being dropped.

bold prediction to make but i believe we are witnessing disclosure.

1952
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/SenorPeterz on 2024-11-15 15:16:36+00:00.

1953
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/GoFunkYourself13 on 2024-11-15 14:58:13+00:00.

1954
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TheMirrorUS on 2024-11-15 14:53:13+00:00.

1955
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Mundane-Inevitable-5 on 2024-11-15 12:51:40+00:00.


As a user kindly pointed out on another thread the latin phrase on the bottom of the missing 12th document of the Schellenburger submission to congress means, KNOWLEDGE PROVEN BY FIRE, TRUTH THROUGH FAITH. I noticed a pretty wild coincidence and thought this deserved its own thread.

So there was a video uploaded six days ago on the renowned and much loved, eyes on cinema YouTube channel, called the Betty Andreasson alien abduction incident in south Ashburnham Massachusetts, which happened in 1967.

The audio of the lady recounting her story is from 1979 I think. Around 1:20 into the video she says that in her encounter with the beings, they said they needed her to provide them with KNOWLEDGE TRIED BY FIRE. To which her response was to give them a copy of the bible. Obviously this is essentially the same thing said at the end of the Schellenburger document in Latin.

Now personally I'm not religious in the slightest, but I am very interested in the religious aspect as it relates to the lore (for lack of a better word) around this topic. Chris Bledsloe's story, the alleged Collins Elite group operating within the American deep state, that believe this phenomenon to be demonic in nature and most importantly in this instance I think, the Rosicrucian element attached to some pretty prominent figures in the field, such as Hynek, Vallee and many of the others associated with the invisible college.

The coincidence brought up some interesting questions for me. Firstly Is this immaculate constellation leaked info related to the Rosicrucian element somehow? Strangely in an interview released just yesterday on Jesse Michels channel with Schellenburger, he made a point of emphasising that he'd rekindled his Christian faith recently. Maybe not relevant, but an interesting side note.

Is the channel eyes on cinema linked to the Rosicrucians and by that I really mean Vallee somehow? The reason I ask that is because, It's a pretty mysterious channel as far as I can tell, I have no idea who owns it, but they seem to have every UFO related piece of media known to man archived somewhere and it has been noted publicly by the likes of Pasulka and Nolan, that Vallee has insane amounts of archived information on the topic. I again come back to the timing of the coincidence of the upload of an obscure video with an abductee in the 1970's sighting the phrase, knowledge tested by fire that just a week later would appear on a document submitted to congress. Is it a bread crumb somebody wanted people to find?

This leads to further questions and I may lose some people, but hear me out. Was Betty Andreassons abduction experience linked in some way to the Rosicrucians? Sounds outlandish, but consider the following.

There's a school of thought, deep down the rabbithole, that at least some of this phenomenon is essentially part of what amounts to a Rosicrucian grand plan to bring about a new spiritual age in the material world, by influencing the collective thought of the masses i.e that some or all of this phenomenon is being carefully and deliberately staged by this order, to slowly and organically shift human consciousness into believing it's something it's not.

Vallee has talked about it pretty openly in his books, stopping short of actually attributing it to his own order the Rosicrucians. For those unfamiliar with his work, in short essentially he theorises, that given the absurd nature of the phenomenon, what it may be is some sort of deception, a control system, designed to make us think that this is Aliens from another planet visiting us for whatever reasons, but actually it's not at all, it's a completely different form of intelligence that is somehow staging this, because it wants us to think that, for the purpose of influencing our collective consciousness.

The strange thing is the idea of influencing collective consciousness however is very much part of the Rosicrucian belief system. Again I'm greatly simplifying here, but it's my understanding that the central belief system of the Rosicrucians is that the reality in which we currently reside, is itself a deception, a hologram if you will. They believe there is a true reality that lies within a higher plane of existence and the way for humanity to reach it, is with a collective shift in our consciousness and their goal is to subtly influence hummanity into this shift in consciousness.

Now I have to credit this to an English guy I saw talk about it in a video the other day. On a youtube channel called project Unity, in a video titled, this old UFO case has shocking new revelations, the researchers name (although I don't think it was his channel) was Jean-Luc (as far as I can remember anyway, he said something about his mother being French, but he had an English accent)

In the video he talks about the famous Lonnie Zamora case and the symbolism as described by Zamora that appeared on the side of the landed craft that he saw and how it was supposedly changed from Zamoras original description of it in his testimony, to something else when it was later entered into the files of project Blue Book and of course the person who changed it, was none other than Rosicrucian J Allen Hynek.

What it was changed to in Blue Book and apparently you can see this in the offical artists renditions in the files from Blue Book, is a symbol that was taken from what was essentially a Beligian cult in the 1930's called FUDOSI, that sought to merge all the Christian and Jewish mystic and occultist sects under one umbrella and a unified belief system. Subsequently they failed in this, but it's interesting to note, a very prominent sect of this form of occult mysticism dervied from gnosticism is of of course Rosicrucianism and the order of the Golden Dawn.

Which is interesting in that I think it at least shows that for whatever reason Hynek at least was being influenced by his own belief system when approaching his work in the UFO subject. Why he'd change a symbol in an official record of a UFO case in a Government log to a symbol used by a 1930's religious cult that just so happened to be related to the Religious order he was a follower of, well your guess is as good as mine.

Now I'm not smart enough to connect all this myself and I suppose I don't have much of a coherent point here, but sparked by the original coincidence (or maybe delibarate connection) it just sent my mind down this rabbit hole and I wanted to put it out there in the hopes that someone else can take it further.

I don't exactly know what it is, but my gut feeling is that there really is something there with all this occult mysticism as it relates to this subject. Not that the phenomenon itself is related to it necessarily, although it could be, but more that people deeply inbeded within this field, the gatekeepers essentially or at least groups within are of the belief that the phenomenon is related to this, or they know it for a fact, or they want the public to believe it for some reason. Again your guess is as good as mine.

Thanks for reading my ramblings anyway.

1956
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Ill-Speed-7402 on 2024-11-15 13:51:05+00:00.

1957
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Jaslamzyl on 2024-11-15 13:17:44+00:00.

1958
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/rexcision on 2024-11-15 05:39:34+00:00.

1959
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Ok-Teacher-2612 on 2024-11-15 09:01:41+00:00.


“But there are interesting cases that I – my physics and engineering background and time in the IC – I do not understand, and I don’t know anybody else who understands them,”

«  Video of some of the cases AARO has discussed publicly will be released on Nov. 19th. »

This new article is very interesting ! It seems that the New boss of AARO isn’t hiding that UFO represent a real challenge.

New videos coming soon, let’s hope it won’t be just trash footage :/

1960
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Consistent-Search927 on 2024-11-15 08:20:36+00:00.

Original Title: This is the story of my grandfather who was a WW2 Fighter pilot Ace, a “Ghost” pilot in the USAF, and helped create the precursor to NATO. He investigated UFOs on a secret joint RAF/USAF committee, had his own UFO sighting and managed the Atomic Woomera Rocket Range in Australia.

1961
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/imnotarobot4realz on 2024-11-15 07:31:32+00:00.

1962
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/duskyxlops on 2024-11-15 05:56:11+00:00.

1963
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/arod0291 on 2024-11-15 03:10:15+00:00.

1964
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/bocley on 2024-11-15 02:47:08+00:00.


Tweet from Marik Von Rennenkampff:

In a supreme irony, ex-AARO director Kirkpatrick accuses UAP transparency advocates of ushering in a “dark age of mysticism and magic.” Kirkpatrick need look no further than his own “magical” and “mystical” claims re: GIMBAL. My email to him is below. I have the receipts.

4.18pm • 14 Nov 2024

1965
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/OneDimensionPrinter on 2024-11-15 02:40:42+00:00.

1966
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Black-0216 on 2024-11-15 02:22:29+00:00.

1967
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PyroIsSpai on 2024-11-15 01:48:44+00:00.

1968
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Arshbhullxr on 2024-11-15 00:57:42+00:00.

1969
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/EntireThought on 2024-11-15 00:53:11+00:00.

1970
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/AngstChild on 2024-11-15 00:40:00+00:00.


Based on Mike Gold’s testimony yesterday, many have pointed out his interest in promoting NASA. And certainly, part of any Chief Growth Officer’s (like Mike) job is to expand revenue and opportunity. But I also think there was a darker side to his proposals we may be overlooking.

Let’s look at what Mike Gold said in the context of supplanting certain privately funded institutions that are already up and running; most of them outside the sphere of NASA’s (or any US government agency) influence.

NASA as a SOL Foundation replacement

“NASA could with relatively little cost and effort host symposium on UAP or even just participate in existing panels, examining the topic.”

NASA as a MUFON/NUFORC (or even AARO) replacement

“Beyond its existing archives, NASA could act as a clearinghouse for civilian and commercial UAP data.”

NASA as an Americans for Safe Aerospace (Ryan Graves) replacement

“[NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System or ASRS]… is administered by NASA and funded by the FAA provides a confidential means for the reporting of safety violations in a voluntary and non-punitive manner.”

NASA as a (Harvard) Galileo Project replacement

“I think tailored instruments that would look at UAP in the same way that we have tailored instruments to look at astronomical data is important to gathering valuable and uniform information.”

Ultimately I can’t help but think Gold’s proposals seem more like a “catch and kill” type operation. NASA taking a bigger role would diminish the influence of these newly established private organizations and help consolidate US government control of the UAP narrative.

IMHO we don’t really know the motivations of NASA. Sure, it might be an academic motivation entirely as Mike suggests. But OTOH we have 50+ years of NASA working closely with the US intelligence apparatus. We know that NASA refused a UFO inquiry from Jimmy Carter in the 1970s. More recently, NASA administrator Bill Nelson publicly disparaged David Grusch’s testimony as simply “having a friend who knew where a warehouse was”.

I think we have reason to believe NASA isn’t being fully transparent about UAP despite Mike Gold’s claims. We need less consolidation under NASA’s umbrella, not more.

1971
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/NovUfoHearings on 2024-11-15 00:04:38+00:00.

1972
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TommyShelbyPFB on 2024-11-14 23:45:57+00:00.

Original Title: First indication of change of tone from AARO's new leadership: PBS reporter tweets out new AARO director Jon Kosloski describing some of the recent UAP cases as "true anomalies", having multiple eyewitnesses with videos, exhibiting different morphologies,” including "orbs, cylinders, and triangles".

1973
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/RedQueen2 on 2024-11-14 22:35:01+00:00.

1974
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/showmeufos on 2024-11-14 22:33:09+00:00.


Senator Mike Rounds, one of the co-sponsors of the UAP Disclosure Act (UAPDA), spoke at an event for the UAP Disclosure Fund (UAPDF) yesterday.

A video of that speech can be seen here.

For ease of reading, I've included a transcript of that speech below:

Senator Rounds: First of all, thank you very much for the opportunity. I've prepared just a few remarks and then I left them with the presentation. I was not expecting this size of a group. I'm happy to see that. It says curiosity is alive and well in the United States.

For a number of years, I've been concerned about congressional oversight of matters related to UAPs. I believe Congress has the responsibility to exercise this oversight with an eye towards accountability by the executive branch of our national security, fiscal responsibility, and maybe most importantly, making sure our citizens are aware within constraints of necessarily classified information, of government programs concerning UAPs. I can tell you from personal experience, this concern is a bipartisan one.

For example, the Democrat leader of the Senate Senator Chuck Schumer and I have partnered on legislation to require significantly greater UAP related disclosure by the executive branch. I believe this bipartisan approach can carry over into the next Congress and the next administration. During my 10 years as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and over the last two years as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I've become increasingly aware of stove pipes or silos that adversely affect information sharing, coordination, action and, as a result, good national security policy. These silos do not only exist between national security agencies and between elements of the intelligence community. They also exist between congressional committees with jurisdiction for national security. As one of the very few Senate members who sits on both the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees, I am concerned about the silo between these two committees, at the member and the staff levels. These silos can create all kinds of problems. One of these is preventing proper congressional oversight of UAP initiatives.

I will continue working with my colleagues to overcome this inter-agency and inter-committee issue that can get in the way of what Congress needs to do with regard to UAP oversight. One aspect of required congressional oversight is making sure we are taking a science-driven approach to UAPs. We need to make sure that an executive branch priority is also a science-driven approach.

Let me just close for just a second with regard to UAP-related legislation that we proposed and that we will be proposing. Last year, Senator Schumer and I offered a bipartisan UAP-related amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act. That's the NDAA that passes every single year. This amendment which passed the Senate was entitled the "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon Disclosure Act of 2023." The measure was directly modeled on the legislation Congress passed in the 1990s to set up a process to declassify and release the records that federal government had relating to the Kennedy assassination. Even now, thirty years later, some records are still withheld, but overall that process has been deemed very successful.

While the measure was included in the Senate-passed NDAA, it was unfortunately dropped from the final version of the bill that was negotiated with the House, which opposed our language. What was enacted was the establishment of UAP record collection in the National Archives, to which all records, from all parts of the federal government, are to be sent. Dropped was what would have been the creation of a records review board composed of eminent expert citizens with clearances, nominated by the President, and Senate confirmed. This board would have overseen the record review and declassification process to include identification of any conscious effort by an administration to withhold appropriate information from Congress or the public. I look forward to continuing work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to make the review board a provision of law.

And finally, let me just say that I want to take a moment and I want to recognize Lue Elizondo's contributions to increase UAP transparency and congressional oversight. Lue, you came forward to me, and the intel committee, and provided the insights that I needed to develop the UAP legislation with Senator Schumer. You helped me to understand a couple of truths. Number one, the UAP issue is real and a potential national security concern. And number two, the U.S. government has not been transparent enough about what it knows.

UAP transparency is a marathon. It took many decades to result in the status-quo of over-classification, and it will likely take time to find the right balance between protecting our national security, and an acceptable level of disclosure. Lue, in recognition of your contribution to UAP legislation in the last Congress, I would like to give you this framed red line of the UAP legislation.

Thank you for the opportunity to share with you. I think as I talked with everybody involved in this particular subject matter, those that have been directly involved, please understand the challenges that we have with regard to our national security challenges, and in sharing what we know about things that really... we don't know a lot about in some cases. All we know is that there is something that exists, whether it's ours, or an adversaries, or something else, we don't know. What we do know is that this phenomenon clearly exists and it's something that's not going to go away. So we just as well get in and learn as much about it as possible and let the public know what it is that we find out as well. Thank you.

Highlights from Senator Rounds' speech:

  • He's been concerned about "congressional oversight of matters related to UAPs" for a number of years
  • He believes Congress has the responsibility to exercise this oversight regarding UAPs
  • The concern over UAPs in Congress "is a bipartisan one"
  • During his ten years as a SASC member, and two years as a SSCI member, he's become "increasingly aware of stove pipes or silos that adversely affect information sharing, coordination, action."
  • These silos exist between national security agencies and elements of the IC
  • These silos also exist between congressional committees with jurisdiction for national security
  • As one of the few members on both committees, Senator Rounds is concerned about the silo between the SASC and SSCI, at both the member level and the staff level.
  • Such "silos can create all kinds of problems" and one of those problems is "preventing proper congressional oversight of UAP initiatives"
  • He's wants to make sure we're "taking a science-driven approach to UAPs."
  • He says "Let me just close for just a second with regard to UAP-related legislation that we proposed and that we will be proposing." This is interesting, as it explicitly says "legislation... that we will be proposing." So there is more UAP-related legislation coming!
  • He looks "forward to continuing work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to make the review board a provision of law." He still wants the oversight and review board, and intends to make it a provision of law.
  • He thanks Lue for his contributions, saying they were "needed" for Congress to "develop the UAP legislation," and notes that Lue has come forward to both Senator Rounds himself as well as the SSCI.
  • He says "UAP transparency is a marathon," and it will likely take some time to get to an "acceptable level of disclosure."
  • He says that regarding UAPs "we don't know a lot about in some cases."
  • This last quote is a banger: "All we know is that there is something that exists, whether it's ours, or an adversaries, or something else, we don't know. What we do know is that this phenomenon clearly exists and it's something that's not going to go away. So we just as well get in and learn as much about it as possible and let the public know what it is that we find out as well."
  • Senator Rounds (to paraphrase) is basically saying "whatever this is, it's real, but we don't know what it is," and they want to learn as much about it as possible. It doesn't sound like the UAP issue is going away anytime soon as far as the Senate is concerned.
1975
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/MelodramaticMoose on 2024-11-14 18:30:10+00:00.

view more: ‹ prev next ›