The UFO reddit

132 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion related to Unidentified Flying Objects. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. We aim to elevate...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
126
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/eaglesbaby200 on 2024-12-25 01:40:47+00:00.

127
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PURPELCANDY on 2024-12-24 22:17:42+00:00.


What do you think about this theory?

The orbs are dismantling all the nukes in the world, silently and methodically. Their presence remains a mystery, and no one knows their true origin or purpose. No one will disclose it: not the US, not China, not Russia, not any nation. Each government only knows about itself—that their nuclear arsenals have vanished without a trace—but they are completely in the dark about whether the same has happened to others.

This creates an atmosphere of global uncertainty and paranoia. No one dares to admit the loss of their nuclear weapons, fearing it would expose a perceived weakness and lead to a loss of geopolitical power. Publicly acknowledging it would mean admitting that something far beyond human control has intervened, undermining decades of military strategy and deterrence theory.

Behind closed doors, world leaders are grappling with the implications. Are these orbs a neutral force, or do they represent an unknown threat? And if the nukes are truly gone worldwide, does this open the door to a new kind of global cooperation—or to fresh conflicts driven by fear and mistrust? The silence, for now, persists, as the world teeters on the edge of an unprecedented shift.

128
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PositiveSong2293 on 2024-12-24 22:13:36+00:00.

Original Title: A likely legitimate video of the famous Big Sur UFO incident surfaces. The incident is widely known within the UFO community, and according to whistleblowers from various eras, there has always been a video showing a UFO disabling a nuclear warhead of a missile in 1964.

129
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/habitualmoose on 2024-12-24 19:40:35+00:00.

130
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Better_Than_Free123 on 2024-12-24 21:22:19+00:00.

131
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/OkPoet9382 on 2024-12-24 21:03:31+00:00.


Just wanted to wish happy holidays to all of you who spend your nights looking up instead of down: "We're all in the gutter but some of us are gazing at the stars."

And remember - if you see a flying red light tonight, it's probably just Santa (but take a video anyway, just in case 😉).

Stay curious in 2025, and may all your encounters be of the friendly kind!

132
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/AyCarambin0 on 2024-12-24 20:40:10+00:00.

133
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Spiritual-Journeyman on 2024-12-24 19:39:26+00:00.


With the surge in recent UAP with well defined hot-spots, where is Avi Loeb and team with their newest sensors collecting data on these to publish scientifically? Why all this waiting for the govt to tell us. Aren’t Nolan and Loeb advocating civilian data capture and jump starting the scientific/academic process on this???

134
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PositiveSong2293 on 2024-12-24 19:15:11+00:00.

135
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/No-Dig-8554 on 2024-12-24 18:43:52+00:00.

136
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/fr4ct4lPolaris on 2024-12-24 16:37:58+00:00.


As stated in the title (and posted on this sub before) 43 google search queries for "immaculate constellation" originated from NB, Canada in 2009.

There are two plausible reasons for this. Stanton T. Friedman, a Canadian UFO researcher who has since passed, knew something that we only discovered recently, and he is responsible for those searches. There is also a less likely explanation.

For those unfamiliar with New Brunswick, it is a largely conservative Christian province in Canada, and it's possible that someone was simply misspelling "immaculate conception." However, I find this explanation to be unlikely.

What are you thoughts?

137
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/REAP-IR7 on 2024-12-24 17:49:09+00:00.

138
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/binarysuperset on 2024-12-24 17:32:37+00:00.

139
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/bassCity on 2024-12-24 16:57:25+00:00.

140
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Baconkings on 2024-12-24 15:09:37+00:00.

141
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Lee3Dee on 2024-12-24 15:01:39+00:00.


I've noticed that ever since a neutered and semi-debunked version of the Rendlesham event aired on the Why Files that this community has lost interest in the events of those three or possibly four nights in the UK military base. To be blunt, the shortcomings of that Why File episode cannot be explained by incompetence or laziness. I'm attaching a video about the Capel Green landing on the third night of the event and posing the question: why would AJ have failed to mention Larry Warren, who was, after all, the original whistleblower. Why did AJ ignore the second landing on Capel Green? Why did he ignore events that took place in the hanger where the airplanes were repaired? Why did AJ concentrate on debunking the dubious binary code etc of the first night's events instead of giving us an overview of what actually happened during the following nights at Rendlesham, a version that we could have layered over current events. I am suggesting AJ has an agenda that ain't about truth or comedy.

In the following video the whistleblower Larry Warren tells his first-hand story of the third night at Rendlesham, an event, involving a second craft landing, that might give us insight into what is currently happening inside military bases around the world. Do I trust the Why Files? Well, as Jacque Vallee once said about UFOs: "Don't trust anybody. Don't even trust your own eyes."

Anybody interested in Bentwaters/Rendlesham needs to read NONHUMAN, the definitive book on the subject by Gary Heseltine, a former police detective at an RAF base in the UK. Heseltine's book was published shortly before the Why Files episode aired yet AJ chose to ignore its findings. Heseltine makes it clear that the whistleblower Larry Warren is the key player of this event. No offense, Hecklefish, but you need to call out your sidekick. Because something stinks here and it ain't yer fishbowl.

142
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/weheartlocal on 2024-12-24 13:59:56+00:00.


If it is non-human intelligence (NHI) causing these drone and orb sightings, I urge people to remain calm and think rationally. We shouldn't be shooting at them or creating mass panic. If it is indeed NHI, consider these simple facts:

They likely possess more advanced technology than us to have reached here. Applying human logic and intelligence to them is ineffective, as we have no idea what their motives might be. People worry they want to enslave us, seize Earth's resources, or that we need to go to war—these are human concerns and may not align with their motivations, which could be completely different or even incomprehensible to us. If they had wanted to eliminate us, they probably would have done so already. This is not a movie scenario; Will Smith can't just fly into a mothership and destroy it. We cannot assume our actions in fictional tales apply here. If they initiate an attack, our best response would be to attempt communication and show compassion, our true strengths. I'm not saying we shouldn't defend ourselves, but aggressive action should be our absolute last resort. At best, we might be as intelligent to them as dogs and cats are to us, so we should aim to be perceived as loving and useful. At worst, we might be like ants to them, but even then, communication should be our first tactic. Provoking them is likely a poor strategy.

Remember, the more intelligent a species becomes, the less violent it typically is. It's likely that NHI operates with purpose and structure, not randomly. Their technology to travel here from potentially billions of light years away suggests they can solve their own problems without needing our resources. History of their visits indicates they do not view us merely as bugs; their sustained interest suggests a capacity for consideration, maybe even empathy. They're observing us out of curiosity, not for exploitation.

In summary, if NHI wanted to harm us, they likely would have done so by now. Their behavior suggests a more evolved and empathetic nature, indicating they probably don't need anything from us. It's almost certain we can't defeat them with violence, so let's use it only as an absolute last resort. Humanity should first attempt communication, and if that fails, prepare but wait to be attacked before provoking one. This approach may involve risks, but honestly, our conventional weapons likely won't be effective, so attack should be the last resort. If we're not currently under attack, why provoke the worst possible outcome?

143
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TimTheGrim55 on 2024-12-24 10:00:50+00:00.


So I don't have much time on hand during daytime usually so whenever I find an interesting post on Reddit I just leave the tab open on my phone to come back to it later. I sometimes do this over the course of days and then come back to a post like 2 weeks later....I do this on multiple subs but what's odd is that mostly on this one, like 80% of the posts are deleted by the time I come back to them (usually by mods).

And not only like sighting posts that could've been debunked in the meantime and therefore deleted but also just ideas and discussions shared.

I am not paranoid and there could be very reasonable explanations but I found that interesting. Anyone got ideas why that is?

144
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/waldschraetin on 2024-12-24 09:18:36+00:00.

145
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/5_meo on 2024-12-24 12:35:07+00:00.

146
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TommyShelbyPFB on 2024-12-24 11:22:55+00:00.

Original Title: Video shows an alleged non-human craft falling out of the sky the moment a nuclear bomb is detonated mid-air during a test in Los Alamos, NM in 1962. JFK was briefed about the craft and rushed to Los Alamos along with LBJ according to their aide who was also present. (More in submission statement).

147
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Fermato on 2024-12-24 10:25:20+00:00.


Found this behind a paywall, copy pasting without the images.

Inside the Monthlong White House Effort to Quell New Jersey Drone Frenzy

Biden called the Pentagon four times seeking information and was told the military had found nothing unusual

WASHINGTON—President Biden’s first call to the Pentagon about the drones over New Jersey came on Dec. 12, nearly a month after the initial reports of mysterious flying objects in the night sky, U.S. officials said. In the days that followed, Biden called Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin again. And again. And again, seeking updates.

By then, the drone frenzy had escalated into a major headache for the White House, fueled by rumors about an Iranian mother ship off the coast, by videos of unknown aircraft hovering over suburban towns—and by little information from Washington except assurances that there was nothing unusual. Though the sightings began on Nov. 18, the Department of Homeland Security didn’t brief New Jersey’s congressional delegation on what it knew until Dec. 4, and then not again until weeks later, lawmakers said. The White House didn’t address the issue publicly until the same day Biden called Austin, playing down what had become a national fixation.

“There is no known malicious activity occurring,” White House spokesman John Kirby told reporters, adding that federal authorities were investigating the sightings with New Jersey state law-enforcement agencies. Within days of the first sightings, DHS, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other agencies were looking for explanations and were in touch regularly with New Jersey law enforcement and officials, a senior Biden administration official said. The FBI opened a tip line on Nov. 25 and ran down “every single one” of the 6,000 tips it received, the official said. As concern mounted, White House aides at the National Security Council began daily check-ins with the relevant agencies, the official said, never finding any evidence of criminal activity, a national security threat or a public safety danger.

But those findings frustrated state and federal lawmakers. “I just didn’t see the commensurate type of response by the administration to meet that level of public interest,” said Sen. Andy Kim (D., N.J.). The response gave President-elect Donald Trump an opening to suggest, without evidence, that the White House was withholding the truth. “Our military knows and our president knows, and for some reason they want to keep people in suspense,” Trump told reporters this past Monday, urging that the drones be shot down.

The sightings began the night of Nov. 18, when law-enforcement officers in northern New Jersey began seeing several drones in the sky. Live Storm Chasers, a local weather-tracking group with 1.3 million Facebook followers, posted that “at least five, unknown, large drones have been flying unauthorized for over 2 hours.” The Morris County prosecutor’s office said there was no known threat to public safety and urged skepticism about online reports. It didn’t work, and the attention might have attracted more drone pilots who made the situation worse, said Rob D’Amico, a former FBI counterdrone chief.

“I grew up in New Jersey. If I was a teen with a drone, I’d be flying over the mayor’s house, I’d be flying over the sheriff’s house,” D’Amico said. “I’m a smartass, and there are a lot of smartasses in New Jersey.” As the sightings continued, the FBI’s Newark office opened an investigation on Nov. 20, and the Federal Aviation Administration two days later issued a temporary prohibition on drones over the Trump National Golf Club Bedminster. Days later, the agency ordered another temporary flight restriction over the Picatinny Arsenal, an Army research center, where there have been several confirmed sightings of unidentified drones entering the airspace.

Then things really took off.

Across the Atlantic, unidentified drones were spotted flying over four military bases used by the U.S. in the U.K. “Small unmanned aerial systems continue to be spotted in the vicinity of and over Royal Air Force Lakenheath, RAF Mildenhall, RAF Feltwell and RAF Fairford since Nov. 20,” the Air Force said in a statement, giving the names of the British bases. The Pentagon offered no explanation, just as in New Jersey.

By Dec. 4, the state’s elected officials took matters into their own hands. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy organized a Zoom call for the delegation with Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Rep. Chris Smith (R., N.J.) said he asked why the U.S. government couldn’t follow one of the mysterious drones. “We surely have the capability to follow one. He didn’t know,” Smith said.

A DHS spokesman disputed Smith’s account, saying in a statement that Mayorkas explained that the department had limited authority to track and take down drones, citing restrictions imposed by Congress. On Dec. 8, a Coast Guard officer at Island Beach State Park in New Jersey told Smith that one of its 47-foot vessels had been trailed by as many as 30 drones, the lawmaker said.

Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R., N.J.), a member of the House subcommittee on aviation, said in an appearance on Fox News that he had “high sources” telling him the drones were coming from an Iranian “mother ship” in the Atlantic. He had been alerted by three people with links to U.S. intelligence that the vessel had left its port in Iran in November, Van Drew told The Wall Street Journal. “I have not been presented a single credible, cohesive narrative except for that Iran is controlling these drones from offshore,” Van Drew said in a letter sent to Biden on Dec. 11.

Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh soon responded: “There is no Iranian ship off the coast of the United States, and there is no so-called mother ship launching drones toward the United States.”

148
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/radiantbeing1111 on 2024-12-24 09:03:06+00:00.

149
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/DeepFriedHuman_ on 2024-12-24 06:23:49+00:00.

150
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/ApprehensiveCup6217 on 2024-12-24 06:13:49+00:00.

view more: ‹ prev next ›