this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38550 readers
2812 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Dutch data protection watchdog on Tuesday issued facial recognition startup Clearview AI with a fine of 30.5 million euros ($33.7 million) over its creation of what the agency called an “illegal database” of billion of photos of faces.

The Netherlands’ Data Protection Agency, or DPA, also warned Dutch companies that using Clearview’s services is also banned.

The data agency said that New York-based Clearview “has not objected to this decision and is therefore unable to appeal against the fine.”

But in a statement emailed to The Associated Press, Clearview’s chief legal officer, Jack Mulcaire, said that the decision is “unlawful, devoid of due process and is unenforceable.”

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

30 million? For a billion pictures of faces? Lol. Of course they hacen't appealed, that fine is a pittance to them.

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Alas it sounds like the company is even dumber than that. From their quote,

But in a statement emailed to The Associated Press, Clearview’s chief legal officer, Jack Mulcaire, said that the decision is “unlawful, devoid of due process and is unenforceable.”

I am guessing the reason they didn't appeal is because they refuse to recognize the jurisdiction of the Dutch courts altogether.

However, this is wrong, and I'm pretty sure it will come back to bite them. Under the GDPR,

EU data protection authorities may fine companies that continue to do business with US organizations that violate GDPR

and also

EU and US companies may pursue US companies for breach of contract, if GDPR compliance is written into the underlying agreement. These contractual claims may be adjudicated in US courts, depending on the contract, even if they relate to EU compliance.

So in short US companies that do business in the EU and also do business with Clearview may get sued and have to pay up on Clearview's behalf. Expect Clearview to run out customers shortly after the first set of suits get litigated successfully against Clearview's customers...

(Edit: source from https://www.metaverselaw.com/how-will-gdpr-be-enforced-in-the-us/ )

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 weeks ago

Mulcaire said in his statement that Clearview doesn’t fall under EU data protection regulations.

“Clearview AI does not have a place of business in the Netherlands or the EU, it does not have any customers in the Netherlands or the EU, and does not undertake any activities that would otherwise mean it is subject to the GDPR,” he said.

It stole personal data of EU citizens, which is a crime in the EU and the US.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's unlikely they will pay, though.