this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
553 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Biden said he is "not confident at all" that there will be a peaceful transfer of power in January 2025 if former President Donald Trump is defeated.

"He means what he says. We don't take him seriously. He means it. All the stuff about 'If we lose, there'll be a bloodbath, it'll have been a stolen [election],'" Mr. Biden told CBS News chief election and campaign correspondent Robert Costa in his first sit-down interview since announcing he was dropping out of the 2024 presidential race and endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for the Democratic nomination. The interview will air on "CBS News Sunday Morning" on Sunday, Aug. 11.

"Look what they're trying to do now in the local election districts where people count the votes," said Mr. Biden. Repeating a familiar maxim about elections and democracy, the president said, "You can't love your country only when you win."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 170 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Maybe we should have given harsher punishments to the people who tried doing that the first time around?

[–] nolannice@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago

Why are you trying to make elections political?

I mean, look at Germany. Not punishing the Nazis harder the first time worked out so well [in hindsight]

Luckily we can learn from their mistakes and....

Wait...

Shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 120 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I don’t know, I think it’s pretty unreasonable to assume Trump will attempt another coup. What, does he have a coup for one special? /s

I’m glad Biden’s calling this shit out now, and hope they’ve got a plan when a few dozen Arizona counties refuse to certify the results.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One saving grace is this time, it ain't the diaper in Chief calling the shots. Biden won't hesitate to call the national guard if need be.

That being said, i think the violence is gonna happen at State capitals this time.... I hope I'm wrong.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

I think you’re right. I honestly think Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, etc should probably have the national guard in place the night before.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

What, does he have a coup for one special?

Take a lap.

[–] vortexsurfer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

What, does he have a coup for one special?

Maybe he has a... coupon...?

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Average American president attempts 0.004 coups per year" factoid actually just a statistical error. Average American president attempts 0 coups per year. Traitors Donal, who dyes face orange & attempts over 0.25 coups each year, is an outlier adn should not have been counted.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hell, i’m not confident there’d be a peaceful transfer of power if he wins

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Chances are high it will not be peaceful for anyone on his stupid enemies list AFTER the transfer of power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The transfer of power from Biden to Harris should be peaceful because Trump isn't involved in it.

2021 wasn't peaceful only because Trump still had power. If he has no power, you shut that shit down and it's peaceful.

"I want a permit to protest the counting of votes!"

(Checks history) "Yeah, permit denied."

[–] literallyacat@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Idk, Dump has a rabid cult fan base that collects guns

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I live in Baltimore. That shit doesn't scare me. I'd like to see them try.

Trumpers who advertise as such on their vehicles and try starting shit have been known to leave with a couple extra "vent holes" on their vehicles.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have been watching The Wire again so I feel like I also live in Baltimore (I live in Ireland)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I thought those were speed holes.

[–] meleecrits@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

We all know Trump won't accept the results. He didn't in 2020, and in 2016 he claimed it was still rigged against him even when he won.

It's really weird when you think about it.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

Maybe if we had an Attorney-General who did things other than try to ensure he gets into nice country clubs we'd do something about this.

Too bad.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If only he had access to the largest police and surveillance apparatus in the history of ever. Maybe he could, y’know, prevent the inevitable bullshit and bloodletting.

Trumps lies about 2020 were such outrageous bullshit anyway, there wasn’t a single solitary shred of a molecule of truth in any of it. ZERO TOLERANCE, ZERO PATIENCE for that fucking guy and his inevitable bullshit parade.

Fool me once . . . shame on . . . shame on you . . fool me twice . . Y- . . Y’can’t get fooled again.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

See, this is how smart it was Biden not running again.

I completely forgot he existed, and has just been chugging along doing president things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Netrunner@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I love all the closet right wingers thinking some fat ass country loving civilians with guns is going to overtake a country by itself.

The only reason anything happened last time is that agent orange was facilitating the insurrection from the inside. Now its just a bunch of idiots who maybe have guns.

So... America?

Whatever, just get the military ready in case they try.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I appreciate the nonchalance but the help agent orange offered from the inside was calling off some guards for a little bit and mostly just not making a speech telling his fans to calm down. The fact is that January 6th was a pretty disorganized protest that turned into a riot due to a handful of instigators and what we discovered is that the capitol building is not routinely well protected and only avoided riots like this because they hadn't happened.

Which is a good thing. Public institutions should be kept safe because they serve the people well enough that no one wants to take them over. Not because they employ an overwhelming police force to keep the public out. (The original intent was that citizens would be able to just walk around most of these buildings if they wanted to see the government functioning, imagine that eh?)

Now, obviously, DC is going to be on lockdown during inauguration day (as it should be) with a lot more military/police presence. But my point is that if an actually semi-organized militia had been there on Jan 6th with just a few more pistols and some designated leaders and organizers, they would have easily made it into the capitol even if trump had actually done everything to stop them. They would have been massacred in the resulting conflict as the US military sent its full force at them ofc but it would have been a much more consequential day.

This isn't me going to bat for anyone, the right wing militias are pitiful both in numbers and training. It's just that I think the potential for danger and bloodshed when these guys finally snap and make their desperate bid for attention will be a little more violent than I see people seem to think.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's wishful thinking, they have put up far more infrastructure around state election counting than any previous election, the shady shit with batches of votes going missing from 20 years ago is nothing compared to what they're doing nowadays. They will do anything to shift vote counting and then cast doubt about the legitimacy enough that they can send it to the supreme court again. It happened before with Bush v Gore with much less shady dealing and a much less stacked supreme court than they have set up now.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Well, you're the boss. Prepare for what you expect, and lock the rioters up.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 1 month ago

as is anyone who was alive and voting in the last election. You would have to be brain dead to not worry about what that clown may do.

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

This is probably in prep for shutting shit down. If you start warning people now, it'll be "I told you they were gonna wild out, and we're handling it" not "release the rabid dogs on the opposing party".

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The headline makes it sound like he's not gonna let Kamala take his place... 🤔

As for his actual words, Joe's right, Trump's not going down easy. The good news is that Donnie isn't in power now, and won't be in charge of the Federal response to whatever unfolds.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It actually gets really complicated if the damage he does is at the state or local level. A "coup" in the US capital is probably no longer a possibility, but he could cause a lot of chaos if he got a couple dozen scattered enclaves of lawless resistance to lawful voting procedures, and they didn't back down. Are we gonna send national troops to half a dozen different states to make them obey? Is that even constitutionally feasible?

Anywhere we have the slightest doubt about that, we have to act now--Biden has to act now--to guarantee good-faith election management and fallbacks in case it doesn't happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Project 2025 wants to slash military/veterans benefits and it seems most of the military knows about it now. I think we'll be alright so long as Harris wins the election.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It doesn't matter. The vp has the ability to arbitrarily change the election outcome. RIGHT DONNIE?

[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Well of course not. We've already seen them practice.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago

i believe what Biden says not because he said it but because Trump is desperate to pull that get out of jail free card.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

A barricade of couches around the white house will stop trump and JD in their tracks... But for different reasons.

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Well, yeah. If he had said anything else I would be shaking my head at how out-of-touch he was. They will absolutely try January 6th again, only this time I hope the Capitol and DC police are ready for them. Not to mention Congress, maybe they will put a stop to Republican reps helping rioters plan their insurrection.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fortunately, he won't be in power if he loses, so his expected Joe Six-pack rioters won't have the federal government backing them up this time.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I understand Joe Biden here.

load more comments
view more: next ›