this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
186 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8521 readers
701 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 88 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Finally, a hard drive with the capacity to install more than 2 AAA game titles at once.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But can it handle AAAA games?

[–] WanderingCat@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Yes cause they're smaller

[–] techognito@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

This is obviously just in preparation for future AAA game sizes

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

When I bought my first PC about 1982. The seller told me that I would never live long enough to fill up the 10MB drive. I still bought the 40MB drive and it was still too small.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I remember getting a 2 GB hard drive and thinking I'll never be able to fill it up. Now I have video files more then 10 times that size

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think you might be off by a few years at least, a 40MB drive in 1982 would've been incredibly uncommon.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Idk man.

In the 1980s 8-inch drives used with some mid-range systems increased from a low of about 30 MB in 1980, to a top-of-the-line 3 GB in 1989.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives

Seems like 30MB wasn't horribly uncommon in "mid-range systems" in 1980, so I doubt that 40MB in 1982 would've been "incredibly uncommon."

But I've no personal experience from the time.

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Mid-range systems" is not referring to personal computers. "8-inch drives" is another clue.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

True, he did say PC, fair enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Awesome can't wait til they're cheap so I can replace my many hard drives with just one much larger one.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 5 months ago (31 children)

Make sure you buy two of them so you've got a backup. I'm uncomfortable storing 16TB worth of data on one drive, no way am I putting 32TB of anything I give a shit about onto one drive.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

You can buy large second hand enterprise hard disks for relatively cheap. 20TB disks are like 250 bucks.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No god, so how big is the new CoD going to be?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

One petabyte.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Still not enough to hold all my porn.

[–] FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Holy shit how addicted are you?

[–] Shadowedcross@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Least addicted porn downloader.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps there are content provider. Shooting in RAW stakes of a lot of space.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 months ago

I look forward to a Backblaze analysis in a few years.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wonder what the bit error rates are like at that density in practice.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

They're actually 128TB drives, but everything has to be written four times.

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Will raid 6 still be viable at this size or will this require something like raid 10 or even moving beyond raid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's enough for the entire filmography of William Hanna and Joseph Barbera in beautiful 1080p (upscaled using world class software), and it would probably still be enough for some of the early shows of Cartoon Network, at least in 480p.

But then it would take ages to load anyway since it's a hard drive and therefore has moving parts, leading to a significantly higher failure rate.

[–] MDKAOD@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ages is an understatement. This drive uses two new technologies that essentially expand the track momentarily plus smr

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Found the anti-HDD drama queen

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›