Archpawn

joined 1 year ago
[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

I'm not familiar with how they do it in particular, but I do have some experience with what AI art in general can do.

I know there's techniques to generate larger images, but it takes more computing power so I doubt you'd find a place doing it for free. Your simplest method would be to use a simpler AI upscaler like waifu2x. It won't be able to add meaningful details, but it can still make it look okay at a higher resolution. Beyond that, you could start with a smaller image and then outpaint to add more to it. Or maybe generate on image, then upscale parts of it and using upscaling and outpainting from the parts already generated to do the rest.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

This article suggests he was.

Although there is no explicit evidence in the Gospels, we have reason to suggest that he also may have worn phylacteries.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They weren't doing anything smartphone manufacturers haven't been doing for years. Or those guys that make McDonalds ice cream machines.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The majority of dumb stuff in Javascript is that it has some counterintuitive way of doing something that it shouldn't do at all, so only teaching the good parts works. So teaching just the good parts is pretty reasonable.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

In Python you put it in a multiline string, since it has those but not multiline comments.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But that's mostly labor humans were doing anyway.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago
  1. Rain dance And we're not clear on this one, but:
  2. Seeding clouds for rain
[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I used to, but now that we have sexbots why bother?

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It is a more likely place for people from Twitter to migrate to.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

From what I can find, Threads has 10 million active users, and Mastodon only has 1.7 million. Threads may have been a "massive flop" in that they're not doing as well as hoped and the userbase is declining, but it's still far more popular than Mastodon, which also has a declining userbase outside of some recent spikes.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (4 children)
[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He also ran the Boring Company.

view more: ‹ prev next ›