this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
354 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 24 points 4 months ago

The insurance challenges are now making it more expensive and difficult for some utilities to attract the capital required to harden their grids

The grids they've been refusing to maintain or harden for decades, those grids? Given their past history, they wouldn't be acting now unless there was pressure on them - they'd just be handing out another round of executive bonuses and stock dividends.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As it stands now, utilities have become the “insurer of last resort” when it comes to damage claims from wildfires tied to their equipment, said Emily Fisher, general counsel at the Edison Electric Institute, an investor-owned utility trade group. The industry has become difficult to insure because there isn’t a limit to their potential wildfire liabilities, Fisher added.

Power companies also need to spend billions of dollars to make their infrastructure less prone to start fires, funding fixes such as installing weather monitoring equipment, burying power lines and replacing old poles. “It’s not a sustainable regime,” Fisher said.

It is certainly sustainable, though it may not be as profitable. I'm sorry, but I couldn't care less what the general counsel for an investor-owned utility trade group that only cares about the next quarter's earnings has to say on the matter.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is this that Free Market I've always heard about?

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It certainly is. And locally owned and operated production is communism

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

points and screeches

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

have they tried not starting wildfires?

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 7 points 4 months ago

That doesn't sound very profitable

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Considering the utilities refuse to take responsibility for the fires they cause and also refuse to prevent those fires by maintaining their equipment... fuck 'em.

It's time for either regulation or state-owned utilities. Corporations have proven they aren't able to safely provide utility services.