this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
112 points (76.7% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6294 readers
12 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We have big box stores for pets.

We have semi trucks burning diesel to bring pet food and pet supplies to all parts of the world.

We devote some amount of farm land and livestock to feeding those pets.

It's interesting when people suggest to reduce global human population but I have never heard anyone suggest to reduce pet populations as a method for combating climate change or for simply reducing resource usage.

The worldwide dog population is estimated to be 900 million.

There are 600 million to 1 billion cats living in the world today.

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Without large-scale changes to energy production and transportation nothing else matters. There's nothing that can be done on an individual level to stop or reverse climate change (except maybe Eco-terrorism, I guess.)

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't argue this position I act on it like many others. We only get rescues and we neuter or spay them.

Best way to help is to not support breeders or pet shops who sell pets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is a good one lol.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There was a study that looked at this. IIRC 3 medium sized dogs equals one kid (adjusted to be per year because dogs don't live as long).

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Nice. I have a dog but no kids so I guess I can afford to have one or two more and still come out ahead of others in terms of carbon foot print.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Alternatively, take up power exchange and become somebody's pet!

Don't knock it till you try it.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

You aren't wrong. Good luck trying to get people to acknowledge this AND change.

I've had rescues for decades and love them as much as most people in my life. But I would be completely fine if the pet trade stopped existing, from a moral and environmental standpoint.

Cats in particular are devastating to bird populations, and we should make every effort to spay and neuter as many as possible.

But as far as climate change goes, we can start with us. Go vegan if you care about the environment. We contribute far more than the world's pet population, and changing ourselves is our responsibility.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

People concerned about climate change never suggest to reduce the worldwide pet population

It's a widely known issue. For example:

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/15/us/pets-climate-impact-lbg-wellness/index.html

https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/22375369/comic-pets-climate-change-environment

https://ideas.ted.com/the-environmental-impact-of-dogs-and-cats-and-how-to-reduce-it/

Ie. you are wrong that people never suggest it.

This being said, I'll assume your unpopular opinion is about a pet genocide for the greater good, and upvote accordingly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›