this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
308 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow. We don't even need to get a new head of lettuce at this rate. Just keep reusing the existing one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I find it quite interesting that the two candidates that are perceived to be part of the existing Leadership haven't gotten floor votes, while Jordan got floor votes that failed, and this new guy is likely to, also.

I wonder if this is intentional, because they are afraid of having Democrats decide to throw enough support to the centrist candidates to get them over the line, which would end the standoff but put the new Speaker in an even more precarious position.

Republicans can't seem to solve this in their own Caucus, nor can they work with Democrats at all, even accidentally.

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Despite choosing Rep. Tom Emmer as their nominee for House speaker, the GOP faces uncertainty as Donald Trump and other hardliners reject the choice, raising doubts about Emmer's ability to win the gavel.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have the Republicans that vote against Mccarthy and the ones that voted against Jordan sit down and make a list of every representative they would vote for. Then nominate one they agree on.

[–] TimLovesTech@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The right is too far right of the moderates to agree on anything. They need a few purple state moderates to lay down the future of their seat and sit down with the Democrats and work out a compromise. Being in a purple state and you save the house it just might work out for them. Current course is likely to get them all primaried OR replaced with a Democrat next election.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

get them all primaried OR replaced with a Democrat next election

I feel like that's their choice right now. Work with democrats? Get primaried. Don't work with democrats? Democrats win the election.

Working with democrats is poison to the republican base and it's not like democrats are going to vote for a republican as their nominee just because they decided to have a somewhat functioning government.

[–] TimLovesTech@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nevermind, they went with an election denier that would love to drag us into fascistism as fast as possible. Hopefully every R in a purple district is replaced come election time.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

One day I would like to see this session of congress recapped by a literal circus clown act. I think we'd all be able to follow the story even without dialog.

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

In all seriousness, if the People’s business isn’t being conducted, how can they possibly be getting paid or getting benefits?

I said it in another post that Emmer may have been a decent compromise for Dems to extend an olive branch. I’m not saying they’re at fault at all, just that he seemed reasonable.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

LOL at the downvote brigade

gonna be great when there's no time to do a separate budget so they have to pass an omnibus just to pay the military and then the republicans kick the speaker out again

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

More like a cut and oxidizing apple really.

[–] coffinwood@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Has getting nominated become something like a curse or what?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›