this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024

487 points (86.5% liked)

196

16431 readers

1698 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.world

queue@beehaw.org

funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone

PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone

threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.world

remotelove@lemmy.ca

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world

qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qaz@sh.itjust.works

qaz@lemmy.sdf.org

487

Learning about rule theft (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by rockSlayer@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If you want to discuss definition in the formal sense, it suffices to say "that is not the definition of wage theft here it is bla bla". Instead when you say "Wait, what? they are entirely different you insane lunatic" most reasonable people will think that you are completely against even using the two concepts in the same sentence. As an example someone says "Donald Trump is a champion of democracy" and I say "Wait, what? Are you insane? Donald trump and democracy are entirely unrelated".

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"Wait, what? they are entirely different you insane lunatic"

You used quotes but somehow avoided quoting anyone 🤔 odd