this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
260 points (86.1% liked)

Economics

1675 readers
10 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think Louis Rossmann has a series on corporate property (I know we're discussing housing), but in New York it's weird how some of the owners have weird deals where it was better to keep it empty than to take a lower desired price on the property. Like keeping the store empty for years.

I'm not sure what the deal was. It's probably something to do with the loan they received or with the city.