Player freedom doesn't mean open world. Crysis for example spoke a lot about player freedom because it gave you a ton of different tools to go through the levels as you wanted. But it was still a linear single player game
Naryn
It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.
No, it's not. That's how all of the elections you just listed work. That's how first past the post works.
It's executed plenty.
12 were executed in 2022
Zoom in: Texas had 23 clinics in operation before the decision — 12 shut down and 11 are open but only offer services other than abortion.
Of course they are
Not being likely to win doesn't make them illegitimate.
The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties
This person has been in the UK for 15 years.
I'm not saying that's the case, I'm asking what their opinion on asylum laws should be
I think that gay people have to have had a relationship, either sexual or emotional to legitimately claim asylum for their sexuality.
I didn't call him a homophobe.
I'm not even fucking American 😂. I just believe that people have the right to stand and vote for a legitimate candidate.
They vote anti establishment in general, which is the green party.
I just personally hate anyone who tries to argue somebody doesn't have a right to ruin for presidency, they might not win but that's not the point. If you're a democracy, any citizen who meets the criteria has he right to run for an elected position.
It'd only put the US at 5th in the world for minimum wage, which considering the cost of living in the US vs most other countries.